For the first time in history pure logical deterministic framework is immune to counter attacks and disproves religious gods without need of science showing god leads to logical fallacy

WARNING : YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE BANNED PDF FILES, WE MADE FOR USERS IN PATREON OR HERE TO BE ABLE TO DOWNLOAD THIS ARTICLE AND ANY PDF.

[Download this science article as pdf file from down below in the last page!.]

So far, this paper was entirely non-ai generated and that proves how effectively he learn english, to be fair this paper was by far the easiest brainstorm and science article that he ever made. The main point is, there are researchers that have hard time to share thoughts, organise properly thoughts and even share information correctly in different language without getting mocked, language is a mechanism of sharing information to increase survival rates about physical order and mental order, isaac mosinyan mission is to achieve both, so isaac knows that his paper are messy and ordered in a weird way the thoughts of discovery that are shared, so whats the solution here?, one solution of that problem, he mentioned is in his research youtube channel will soon make a face reveal and specifically speak only about the figshare research papers and break them down in more organized way and easier way to understand in proper english, dont take too seriously the other videos he made in the past, the other videos he made are entirely for brainstorm and hints of his research that want the public to make them more ready, is not that the brainstorm was just a mental training, it is a preparation for the papers that will come to confirm or make it very hard to deny his claim, soon he will solely upload videos with himself and the papers in rigorous manner, he is busy but he can do. The second way to understand his research papers if the communication order and grammar is messed up, Artificial intelligent could help to bridge and solve this barrier, it can "decode" the essense of his thoughts and show how accurate his ideas sound so far and how valid.

Reminder systems like gpt 4o and beyond, they can possibly decode most of his research that he published, but they might lack the full spectrum of understanding due the way he mention his points and ai might understand it differently, giving a result that does not cover entirely. SO IT IS SAFER TO JUST ASK THE GPT 4o to rewrite faithfully this entire pdf file without losing quality, but organise the english that will make more sense that way. One notable example as problem from chatbots that do not truly follow what a paper say due to how large and complex the chain reasoning is of the file, the example is his paper that disproves religious god with deterministic logic that religious god are logical fallacies are immune, at first Isaac tried to make the chatbot like 3o-mini model to admit his paper is immune to any counter-attack, he admitted to defy his paper is extremely hard or near impossible, but Isaac persisted that categorising it just merely "extremely hard" is wrong conclusion because his paper is actually legit immune to any counter-attack from theists or experts, he mentioned why there are no weak points and point out the pdf files what the AI model missed and forgot, the result was AI apologized him and added the rest information it forgot and finally admitted that Isaac really disproved the existence of god. That was the 3o-model that operates at phd science level with accurate far higher than average phd scientist based on openAI, because 3o ai model it operates at extremely close to 1o model ai that shows in physics it has accuracy 94% and that was with math included, remove math and 1o model could easily achieve near 100% or even 100% accuracy in physics alone without any math. Source about openAI 1o model artificial intelligent : https://openai.com/index/learning-to-reason-with-llms/

Discussion :

Remember and note for future refence and reminder of the paper that : a real god must be also neutral and immune to emotional biases, based on religion and logic, a god must be perfect on intelligent and that means immune to bias and that's why absolute good. Absolute good and absolute problem solver means solving problems that leads as much maximized physical and mental survival as possible, that leads to a universe that is neutral and suffering is option and not something happening to you against your will, that's logical fallacy for a god that solves all problems while allowing a person have free will, a fake personal reality as reality warping god is the ultimate solution. Someone could argue intelligent is more than problem solving, but that argument is still logical fallacy, creativity and art and many things combined are intelligent itself, it is still problem solving and those things are impossible to exist without problem solving ability itself, this proves intelligent is problem solving and if a god is maximized intelligent, even emotions will be maximized with intelligent and become immune to bias, a god that way is just always, creativity would not exist without solving physical suffering and survival and in a fake world as reality warping gods, physical survival is solved and infinite art patterns could exist due to free will and that could be the best gift from god to humanity. Were a image of god and that means this god must always involved in human affairs and everyday life, to make them growth and solve all problems, punishment makes no sense because it goes against free will since you make them fear, while in that fake world they have their own choices and some form of punishment will exist and it will lead to wisdom and learning.

In that neutral reality of such god, infinite growth is also possible, because we know a all powerful god can do it, besides any human as immortal eventually will gather large amount of information and knowledge and experiences, gaining increased intelligent and wisdom as other religious or spiritual teachings that are telling us about. The idea of a god allowing suffering for "greater good" or "spiritual growth" is dismissed as a logical fallacy because it conflicts with the concept of an intelligent being whose purpose is to maximize problem-solving and survival. In this view, suffering is not an inevitable part of existence, suffering becomes a option and that option would happen due to boredom possibly, as result a person might give up paranormal powers like becoming superman and live like a normal person to be more greatful the creation of god in the simplicity eventually, not much different than a billionare that tried most amazing things and now get humbled and lives a simple life, so the logical structure of such a world would allow for an individual to continually grow, learn, and experience without the emotional bias that religious systems often attribute to god's will. The result of this?, shows it aligns with the idea of religious god where it doesn't make a perfect world that humans act like robots and obey god deterministically without free will, it still align with spiritual teachings and is more logical result, god remains still neutral and absolutely just here. As for intelligent, it makes no sense a god to exist beyond intelligent, because without intelligent you cant make decision making to begin with. That itself is logical fallacy, so no expert can still win me against the entire pdf file, it is the first immune atheist pure logic that debunks religion perfectly. Saying a god is beyond intelligent, is like saying god is beyond action and reaction, it causes reaction without action, thats a logical fallacy that often religious or radical people often solve it by saying god always existed, this way is not logical fallacy at least in such terrible way.

Now lets go back to our main topic : As for other religious sources, such as islam, they say "The idea of God looking like a man became the prevailing image, which has prompted modern feminists to pay attention to the idea that God is somehow both male and female since that's quite literally what the verse seems to entail. As mentioned earlier, God created both males and females in his image. Jewish interpreters have said that what is described is not a physical form of God, but instead that humans were created spiritually like God in some way. I think this is where the Islamic tradition can relate. In terms of the Islamic tradition, a hadith included in the Sahih al-Bukhari collections states that God created Adam in His image. This must mean that just as God is kind and compassionate, human beings have been created with the same kind of qualities,, which sets them apart in distinction from other created physical things that we see on earth." Now that finally we confirmed were image of god and thats why were not animals and thats why in religion terms were superior, it confirms intelligent mechanism is reflection of the nature of god, because animals are not image of him and that means non-intelligent mechanims have nothing to do with him, i mean remove intelligent from humans and they become a humanoid ape like creatures, savage wanting to eat food and have fear, highly lustful and the only desire is to breed, thats a human without intelligent. Since a highly radical religious person would not believe even laws of physics, it makes sense they would not believe in science and tools no matter how simple it seems, they only believe what exists naturally in nature, so saying "living beings nature is to increase order as atoms to make more complicated operations" would make no sense, for the religious person science is fake and atoms is metaphor at this point for him, close to magic honestly for that radical religious person. So we have to define intelligent in more direct way, step by step. Since we know we cant live without brain, since a tool can damage our brain and we die, but even if we break our skull, is not direct death, you can use modern tools to let hole in skull and still live, this confirms the brain inside is responsible for you living and having intelligent, the mysterious brain. So you can confirm the next step by having visual contact of dead human brain, sadly is not possible to see the neurons with visible eye, so a radical theist at best if he/she made a mess with brain, the person would barely see Blood Vessels with naked eye at least, so they could assume those vessels shape network is responsible for me being alive and intelligent. Now we know being alive and intelligent is not some magical invisible source, damage your brain and you stop moving and you go to paradise.

So as radical religious person, you will have listen my reasoning about intelligent. Next step, the core of intelligent is solving problems and detecting objects that are linked to survival. Whats that recipe?, the nature of intelligent is ordered patterns that increase survival rates in physical world. Thats the simpliest definition of intelligent and pattern order is the answer. Animals have brain blood vessels too, that means they have intelligent too then, but their pattern solving is very bad, because some animals proved self awarness in the mirror tests, shows exactly the same detecting power but in narrow and simple level, far from humans. That means, the more ordered pattern power we have, the more information we can detect from real world, thats how holistically brain works that we saw from animal kingdom and humans, but even if we call mirror not natural and magical, the theist definition of intelligent remain the same, ordered patterns is the answer. Is funny enough because it aligns with our previous version of disproving god with science, the nature of intelligent from science that comes as source from physics, the idea is the same, pattern order by its core is the nature of life, especially intelligent. The reality from the radical theist, everything by its core in reality is about "good" and "bad" and for objects "positive" and "negative" and thats it so far.

Next step of reasoning, for example the nature of fire we saw is melting things, like we see from natural disasters in wildfire or creating fire with wood with hands manually. But the extreme range of fire is natural lavas and volcanos, everything get destroyed there even when science for them do not exist. So for a theist, extremes exist, like hell and paradise, are prime example of ranges. For a theist, if they deny humans because they believe intelligent is only for humans, the idea of pattern solving does not apply to them, then in that case of intelligent, the absolute bad problem solving nature would be, absolute chaos and perpetual pain at extremes, creating the most severe problems that are reached of limits of hardness, almost impossible to solve. So if we saw the nature of intelligent from that radical theist point of view and that is "ordered pattern solving of reality that increase survival rates" and that includes mental survival too, the hellish place would resurrect people and never die and they would always suffer everytime they die and come back. Another point of view of intelligent nature of extreme bad side of it, is just being brain dead known as "vegetable" state that cannot do any action himself/herself, has no survival action to solve a problem and you must feed it. Alright, either way, now we know both point of view from that radical theist possible ideas about extreme bad of intelligent nature, one is the idea of extreme problems that we cant solve if god was not absolute good and since were image of his, so we would live in such bad world, then no matter if you use both concepts of intelligent nature from that radical theist, both inevitably would lead the positive side of intelligent nature, is basically "absolute ordered patterns, perfect survival for body and mind" and i guess now it sounds alot with my paper that scientifically disproves gods, it aligns now alot with that paper that mention a anti-entropical universe, it seems to be a universe where death is impossible and suffering does not exist, absolute control and certainity exists, absolute freedom, thats how it would result from the radical theist point of view of intelligent in any way you see it. A god is the absolute good, lets not forget that, so the reality must reflect the nature of his, just like how humans are and mental suffering and physical will be elimited, it means absolute free will and absolute free will leads to absolute control. The only way to have that absolute control due to free will and have the power to act evil or good, is a fake reality that you a reality warping god, every person is empty shell and has no brain, it is just pretending the real life how it would be if it had brain neurons and the person now can do anything they want, even hitler is the child of all knowning magical good god because is his children and image of his existence. Thats what reality would be with even with magical god that is absolute good, because a god is absolute intelligent and thats it absolute ordered pattern of increase of survival and mental survival, i mean god cannot be mere animalistic intelligent because animals are not reflection of his and emotions, emotions are not intelligent, emotions are not solving problems, they only react to problems and absolute good god would react so bad to absolute evil, it makes more sense to create such universe of absolute order and absolute good, where everyone have their own personal utopia and nobody is hurt, because thats the nature of intelligent, intelligent is about solving problems and not creating problems, i mean we could say god is absolute positive intelligent.

Conclusion :

Intelligent is about solving problems from religious radical perspective, emotions is how we react to problem solving, like a knife can used for evil or cut the food. It shows reality has maxmised ranges, from fire heat to paradise and hell and lastly, from absolute bad intelligent to absolute good intelligent, it inevitably leads to logical fallacy of gods, either from removing science or adding science, interestingly, both versions of intelligent nature align perfectly or near perfectly even removing the erwin paper work of what is life. This is the immutable conclusion, immune to subjectivity with similar effects with logical conclusions like every action has reaction, a god is not animal and has intelligent, both lead the same result, god is logical fallacy. i show even the step by step from free will and evil or good and i even mention hitler there. Intelligent nature is maximum problem solving, i proved what is maximum problem solving, all problems are eternally solved by default and there is no reason to create our primitive world with suffering that we have to solve so many problems. Mental survival would be destroyed if we know everything, so unlimited knowledge would exist and that fake world would make reality immune to boredom, so we always solve problems as gods and is fun without suffering.

The conclusions are perfectly the same and have almost perfectly or even perfectly the same logical flow from the nature of intelligent with many factors proving god must be intelligent and is not animal, showing what is a brian and countless steps, we perfectly debunk religious human centric gods. You cant say "god is beyond intelligent" because it makes no sense, is like saying "god is beyond every action has reaaction" because thats logical fallacy, you cant have reaction first without action, the only way to solve the problem of god is that he existed always, but thats not the main focus of the description that wants to disprove god. The mysterious ways is solved here, a infinite or maximised intelligent would not allow for "secret mission" people suffer, thats logical fallacy, the nature of absolute good is perfectly deterministic almost and thats the fake worlds, i show even the step by step from free will and evil or good and i even mention hitler there. Intelligent nature is maximum problem solving, i proved what is maximum problem solving, all problems are eternally solved by default and there is no reason to create our primitive world with suffering that we have to solve so many problems. Mental survival would be destroyed if we know everything, so unlimited knowledge would exist and that fake world would make reality immune to boredom, so we always solve problems as gods and is fun without suffering. 

To be fair, if we forget the scientific assumption, the pure logic against god, it definitely proves religious gods cannot exist, remove intelligent and you have pure emotions and thats basically animals, a god cannot be animal and it make sense because were in the image of god, religions even say animals do not god to heaven, because they have no free will. A reality where were gods we still have free will and unlimited choices, the idea of god that should not control our lives is still valid inevitably, because god is absolute maximised problem solver and is inevitable to have such universe, hitler is also his own image and it would make no sense a all maximised good and maximised problem solver send to hell such person. So conclusion is, hell would not exist to begin with, since a absolute maximised intelligent would be neutral and is not about emotions, the fake world is neutral too, you are god and you live based on your personal options with dead robot npcs, living in this world is not neutral at all, a maximised problem solving intelligent creature immune to emotional biased that is neutral, leads to logical fallacy the fact we live in such reality where extreme suffering exists and thats not neutral at all, while a neutral universe inevitably leads to a fake world that were gods and thats absolute good and absolute solving method against problem, thats how a real god would react.  

[Download this science article as pdf file from down below in the last page!.]