(DEATH IS ILLUSION) Infinite space expansion is logical fallacy that contradict empirical data and logical frameworks and big bangs might be inevitable

2025-02-10

WARNING : YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE BANNED PDF FILES, WE MADE FOR USERS IN PATREON OR HERE TO BE ABLE TO DOWNLOAD THIS ARTICLE AND ANY PDF.

[Download this science article as pdf file from down below in the last page!.]


Introduction

Isaac mosinyan published a previous paper about "infinite big bangs" that challenges the one singular event of big bangs and infinite void. However, some could argue the paper alone was not enough to make others doubt old assumptions of eternal void, you must fight the core idea that gives birth in the idea of eternal void and eternal darkness that makes big bangs impossible and here is the paper to do exactly this job. The previous paper was a blend of politics and statistical results from big bangs in case of rebirths, politics and human ethics must change if they don't want to reborn in extreme suffering and prevent new big bangs. However, lets dive deeper in this paper to make stronger the infinite big bang hypothesis by weakening the eternal void main source data and arguments. This article is made for those who actually want to think critically instead of just following what older scientists and outdated paradigms say without question. The goal here is not to make definitive claims but to show how unlikely it seems that the universe can avoid big bangs forever. Many people accept ideas like eternal expansion or an eternal void without ever questioning them, but if you actually analyze the logic behind those claims, you start to see serious contradictions. This is an article that pushes people to look at the evidence without bias, rather than just going along with whatever popular theories are repeated the most. The argument presented here is already extremely difficult to refute, and unless new laws of physics are discovered, it might even be impossible to disprove. Why i even think sometimes it is impossible to refuse eternal big bangs and the fact that infinite expansion is logical fallacy?, is because the logic of that deterministic model logical framework, it is working equally in the same logic of "you can't have reaction without action" because it would make no sense, so even with new laws of physics you cannot defy our claim about eternal big bangs and we effectively confirm that big bangs are inevitable, even when we do not get nobel prize for it.

The Infinite Expansion Assumption: A Speculative Idea With No Real Evidence :

The only way the universe could avoid big bangs forever is if whatever is causing space expansion has infinite energy. That means space keeps expanding infinitely and never slows down, never loses energy, and never allows gravity to pull matter back into a singularity. Some scientists actually believe this is the case. The problem? That's pure speculation. There is zero evidence that space expansion has an infinite energy source to keep it going forever.


When you actually think about what infinity means, you run into a serious problem. If something is infinite, that means it has no beginning. And if the universe was always expanding infinitely, then the big bang would have never happened. Matter wouldn't have come together in the first place, and we wouldn't be here to have this conversation. This is the logical fallacy of the eternal void argument when space expansion is used as an excuse to justify it. 

Scientists who push the idea of eternal void without questioning these contradictions are falling into confirmation bias. They want to believe in eternal void because it fits their assumptions, not because the data actually supports it. Real science is about questioning everything, even ideas that have been around for a long time. If the logic doesn't hold up, the theory needs to be challenged. 

Another Factor That Proves Infinite Space Expansion is a Logical Fallacy :

One of the biggest problems with infinite space expansion is that infinity itself has no beginning. If space expansion were truly infinite, then by default, it was always infinite. That means the universe would have been expanding at infinite speed from the very beginning—because if expansion had no starting point, then neither did speed.


This leads to an unavoidable contradiction: 

If expansion was infinite, then speed must have been infinite as well.

If speed was infinite, no big bang could have ever happened because matter would never have had a chance to collapse and form the dense singularity that triggered the big bang.

Since we know the big bang happened, infinite expansion is impossible because it contradicts the very existence of the universe.

This proves that infinite space expansion is not real science—it is a logical fallacy. No matter how much some scientists want to believe in eternal void, it does not hold up under logical scrutiny. The assumption that space expansion will continue forever is not supported by physics—it is a belief driven by confirmation bias.

In reality, expansion must be finite, meaning at some point, gravity will take over and cause another big bang. 

The Perfect Flat Universe Problem: A Misinterpretation of the Data :

A major reason why some scientists think the universe will expand forever and never experience another big bang comes from cosmological data suggesting the universe is "flat". However, this data does not confirm an infinite void.


• The universe is measured as "near-flat", not perfectly flat.

• If the universe were perfectly flat and expanding infinitely, that would mean it had infinite expansion speed from the very beginning—which contradicts the fact that the big bang happened at all. 

• If infinite void were truly the fate of the universe, that would mean expansion had infinite speed from the start, which is another logical fallacy. The big bang would never have occurred in the first place because everything would have always been expanding infinitely fast. 

The idea that the universe is "flat" is based on measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and large-scale structure. However, these measurements are only accurate to a certain degree, and they show that the universe is "near-flat", not perfectly flat. Over an infinite timescale, even the smallest curvature or energy imbalance could cause the universe to evolve in a way that leads to a new big bang.

So, even if the universe appears flat today, that does not mean expansion will continue forever. In infinite time, the natural imperfections in energy distribution, quantum fluctuations, and gravity will eventually cause another collapse and a new big bang. 

The Fate of the Universe: Why Expansion Can't Last Forever

It doesn't matter whether the universe ends in heat death (where all energy is spread out too much for anything new to form) or big rip (where expansion tears everything apart completely). In both cases, expansion is driven by energy, and energy is not infinite. Eventually, the expansion will run out of energy just like anything else in physics.

Right now, space expansion is happening because of inertia left over from the big bang. The energy from that "explosion" is still pushing things outward, and some scientists believe dark energy is also playing a role. But again, nowhere in physics do we have a single confirmed case of infinite energy. That means at some point, expansion slows down, and when that happens, gravity wins. Objects will stop moving near perfection, and even the smallest gravitational attraction will eventually start pulling them back together. A new singularity forms, leading to another big bang.

If you follow the actual deterministic laws of physics, rather than just going along with unverified assumptions, then big bangs are not just possible—they are inevitable.

Conclusion: Is This Argument Impossible or near impossible to debunk? :

As we said, it makes more to sense to support that it is impossible to refuse eternal big bangs and the fact that infinite expansion is logical fallacy?, is because the logic of that deterministic model logical framework, it is working equally in the same logic of "you can't have reaction without action" because it would make no sense, so even with new laws of physics you cannot defy our claim about eternal big bangs and we effectively confirm that big bangs are inevitable, even when we do not get nobel prize for it.

But of course even if you are able to debunk this absolutism of this deterministic logical framework model, you need to solve the rest vital problems too, those are :


1. Prove that infinite energy exists. No evidence of this so far. 

2. Prove that gravity stops working at some point or pull everything. Again, no evidence of this. 

3. Discover completely new laws of physics. This could happen in the future, but for now, we have to go with what's already known. 

So, unless something massive changes in our understanding of physics or you are able to debunk my deterministic framework of the same logic of reaction and action in case of infinity, the idea of an eternal void with no new big bangs seems impossible. The logical contradictions in infinite expansion, combined with the deterministic pull of gravity and the finite nature of energy, make the infinite big bang cycle the far more realistic scenario. 

For those who love science, the real challenge is thinking critically and not just accepting outdated theories because they have been repeated for decades. This article isn't about making claims with absolute certainty—it's about showing how unlikely the eternal void is and how important it is to question everything. If the logic behind a theory doesn't hold up, then it needs to be challenged, no matter how many people believe in it.  

[Download this science article as pdf file from down below in the last page!.]

Here is isaac mosinyan pdf file that was created about this science article :
Death is illusion infinite exp.pdf
Share
Δημιουργήστε δωρεάν ιστοσελίδα! Αυτή η ιστοσελίδα δημιουργήθηκε με τη Webnode. Δημιουργήστε τη δική σας δωρεάν σήμερα! Ξεκινήστε