Entropy science article confirms eternal big bangs are highly more likely to happen than eternal void due to recycle system

1. Introduction

2. Imperfect Energy Distribution: The Engine of Cosmic Structure

The universe operates under the deterministic laws of entropy, which measures how energy is spread throughout a system. If energy were allocated perfectly, there would be no fluctuations to spur the formation of matter. However, the natural imperfections that occur ensure that energy is never perfectly recycled. Even a single unit of wasted energy guarantees that the system deviates from complete equilibrium. This slight inefficiency is crucial; it seeds the formation of ordered cosmic structures while simultaneously ensuring that conditions for a new big bang will eventually arise.

The recycling of energy is not a fixed, identical process—nature cannot replicate the exact conditions that lead to the big bang. This means that each new cosmic rebirth is unique, ruling out the possibility of a closed-loop universe and instead supporting a scenario of infinite big bangs.

3. Inevitability of New Big Bangs

Back to our topic : Even when some experts—often relying on speculations about an eternal void—attempt to downplay this idea, the deterministic evidence from the laws of gravity and the impossibility of perfect efficiency stands uncontested. While theories involving space expansion, dark energy, and dark matter are based on observed properties, they do not carry the same fundamental weight as the principle that perfect energy distribution is impossible.

4. Criticism and Misconceptions

5. Statistical Implications and the Infinite Risk Hypothesis

Evolutionary statistics : We saw how homo sapiens evolved from ape ancestors, humans are traced fishes and traced apes, a large amount of empirical data shows survival is the exception and extinction is the rule based in laws of physics that govern biology in deterministic way. Even the existence of the first living organism that become reality and alive was miracle, it was even more miracle that it replicated itself while it was at the most harsh conditions in a bad era of earth. The mechanism of intelligent itself is extremely rare, so rare that there are no other creatures with advanced intelligent. 21 century is statistical anomaly from physics perspective and evolutionary perspective, chaos is the default setting of the universe flow rather that order that reduces noises of chaos, intelligent is the apex mechanism of order and achieving the same ordered level in general spectrum of human race as is 21 century, are extremely unlikely because our era is statistical anomaly and miracle, even borning itself is astronomically low as experts claim. 

Historical Parallels:

In the context of infinite big bangs, the odds skew even more dramatically. The vast majority of these cycles will recreate conditions marked by severe struggle and oppression. In fact, the statistical likelihood is such that being born into a scenario of extreme suffering—where one might even face brutal realities such as enslavement or, for women, an increased risk of sexual assault—is far more probable than being born into a highly advanced, compassionate society. Even as recently as the year 1800, significant technological advancements were confined to a minority, while the vast majority of people struggled merely to survive. Don't ever dare to think the idea of random rebirths is not bad idea because there is a chance to born as a king, history shows always more than 99% percent of population were poor and slaves and exploited victims and womans sadly had it far more extreme with sexual violations, especially in war, if I was a woman, the idea of big bangs is the last thing that I want to happen, I would afraid death like a person that believes in religious hell in the same way!. Regardless the gender, man or woman the fate of your existence is vile and effectively a eternal hell that is governed from laws of physics with extreme amount of evidence that makes big bangs high likely and eternal void unlikely, especially when nobel Prize winner Roger Penrose has argued in favor of an infinite sequence of big bangs rather than a solitary cosmic event, using independent lines of evidence that undermine the eternal void hypothesis. 

Cosmic Lottery:

Conclusion :

Even if many experts choose to ignore this straightforward evidence, the statistical reality is clear: the universe is overwhelmingly more likely to experience infinite cycles of big bangs than to settle into a single, eternal void. Moreover, across these infinite cycles, the probability of being born into conditions of extreme injustice and suffering—comparable to the eras of slavery and medieval oppression—is vastly greater than the chance of being born into a modern, advanced society like that of the 21st century or even the relatively improved conditions of 1800. Many scientists who advocate for an eternal void may be influenced by confirmation bias, favoring theories that align with their preconceptions rather than following the "naked data" provided by fundamental physics. The deterministic evidence— that energy must be imperfectly distributed and that gravity operates predictably—offers a much stronger, logically consistent framework. Even noted figures like Roger Penrose have provided independent support for the idea of infinite big bangs, which further challenges the eternal void hypothesis by adding vastly more information that favors over eternal big bangs.  

In summary, unless new laws of physics emerge that fundamentally alter our understanding of energy distribution or gravity, the current evidence strongly supports the conclusion that infinite big bangs are inevitable. The deterministic nature of these core principles leaves little room for the eternal void scenario, making it not only less plausible statistically but also less supported by the direct evidence provided by the laws of physics. 

[Download this science article as pdf file from down below in the last page!.]