Resurrecting the terminology of lord objectively physics sourced
Abstract
According to the Oxford Dictionary of English, that oxford is known as 3rd best university in the world, it says the etymology of the word can be traced back to the Old English word hlāford which originated from hlāfweard meaning "loaf-ward" or "bread-keeper", reflecting the Germanic tribal custom of a chieftain providing food for his followers. That means a "lord" is a superior human among normal humans and acts as prime example that gains followers because that lord provides something good to followers like food and food is purely about survival, so a lord basically is the ultimate guider of survival, thats why is called "bread-keeper" and a lord has absolute respect, absolute power over survival based guide, that makes a lord the most superior human. The definition of lord is largely supported sourced by scientific ideas like "pure humans" and "perfect humans" and of course from oxford based source in linguistics that says the idea comes from "bread-keeper" about providing food. This is a huge chain web of knowledge connected all to each other, the core of the source is physics of life and that's anti-entropical nature. How so?, i mean anti-entropical nature selects intelligent as apex mechanism of order, so this directly proves a pure human is real concept and it is a superior human among demi-humans (Isaac made a paper about pure humans) because he/she is nearly immune to evolutionary animalistic noises that come from subconscious brain, that means pure human nature is real concept and many or everyone are not or pure humans yet. Pure intelligent does not mean emotionless, because AI by default is pure intelligent without any emotional drive, intelligent without fear would remain motionless unless someone controls it, . So whats the operating system in case of emotions and intelligent?, that's fear and intelligent combined as ultimate operating system, that's what maximized ordered emotions it means, because it chooses the apex emotional drive for survival in most efficient way by choosing fear mechanism to combine it with intelligent in synergy.
However, with the rise of moral relativism, the decline of religiously sanctioned kingship, and the advent of Darwinian science, the word faded into disuse, becoming either a relic of nobility or a term of mockery. The 21st century, dominated by the belief that human nature is a hybrid of intelligence and animal instincts, has dismissed the idea of superior humans, reducing all individuals to "mere apes" within an evolutionary framework, as result this gived birth to the moral relativism and a subjective society that says no human is perfect and concepts of purity are opinions or subjective claims and not objective scientific claims. This paper argues that such a reduction is scientifically incorrect when it comes to pure humans and perfect humans and that objective classifications of pure humans and perfect humans allow the word "lord" to be reclaimed as an objective title, because when those concepts are objective, the resurrection of hierarchical titles within humans is inevitable and possible, even creating more superior ranks among humans in case of perfect humans, they are called instead of regular lords, it leads to the rank of supreme lord.
[Download this science article as pdf file from down below in the last page!.]
1. The Historical Corruption and Decline of the Word "Lord"
More details about original source of lord in general.
Lord could also mean someone who leads by example, who leads by example?, someone who discover something good about survival first and not secondly, basically the person is updated by the most recent information about best survival based trick and they become prime example for the rest to humanity and inevitably they lead to get followers. That's why in greek word they say "αρχοντας" that in English directly could translated as "archon" and archon (Greek: ἄρχων, romanized: árchōn, plural: ἄρχοντες, árchontes) is a Greek word that means "ruler", frequently used as the title of a specific public office. So now we have to detect the source of a ruler, that's easy when we read evolution and that shows a ruler is a leader that guides followers to survive better in a primitive society and all was about food or food collecting more efficiently.
What does that teach us?, no matter what language, the definition of lord eventually leads to the same source, even if lord in other languages like archon "αρχοντας" it means ruler, but from scientific perspective a ruler based by default history, it means someone who leads the team to survive better and that's why is called apex leader. Sometimes leaders are challenged with a fight in the past, because often leaders cannot be multiple people even if both know how to lead the team.
What about perfect or pure humans? Lords as Protectors of Civilization
2: The objective classification of humans ensures that true superiority is recognized, rather than allowing emotional or arbitrary status systems.
3: A lord must create and enforce mental order, ensuring that language itself is stripped of biases and inaccuracies.
Yes, every human could gain the title of lord and still be equal, the title just ensures to show not everyone are equal if they don't earn this title if they don't become pure human, that is non corrupted human nature and that means it leads to pure intelligent. Pure intelligent means it achieves even maximized emotional order where emotions are used only where is needed and not randomly in aimless way, they are not the operating system in decision making about survival and that results to increase survival both mental survival and physical survival and ensures that it keeps the status of pure human, near immune to evolutionary noises. So whats the operating system in case of emotions and intelligent?, that's fear and intelligent combined as ultimate operating system, that's what maximized ordered emotions it means, because it chooses the apex emotional drive for survival in most efficient way by choosing fear mechanism to combine it with intelligent in synergy, this leads inevitably to maximize the rest ranges of emotional spectrum to align with those 2 operating systems, the fear of big bangs to born again in eternal suffering, basically fighting entropy it ensures to use intelligent to fight back and increase order. The fear comes from the fact who ever ignores anti-entropical nature that is the rules of life from physics, it leads inevitably the fall of humanity no matter how slow the violation it seems, were not omniscient and the risk is huge, even small chaotic patterns can extremely slowly to lead to destruction, like living merely as apes and emotional animals as society and even subjective images like seeing other corrupted humans.
Conclusion :
That assumption is wrong, science of ethics could do that because it can prove objectivity exists and even what is objectively a pure human and perfect human. A pure human is prime example of what is thought to be a pure human nature that is not corrupted yet.
A pure human—a being that has transcended the corrupting influences of evolutionary animalism and embraces pure intelligence as their true nature. A perfect human is a supreme lord, one who has achieved total order in all aspects of life. Isaac mosinyan papers about "Science logic confirms that the terminology of we're animals and linguistics itself are corrupted" and "Overlooked fact of biology that confirms human nature is pure intelligent and defines objectively what is a pure human and perfect human" prove more efficiently and rigorously why those terms are real and even objective, why humans are not mere apes and even calling humans animals is largely wrong. Isaac claims he is definitely a pure human, possibly even perfect human but the idea of perfect human is open to be under debate, but a large part of Isaac life is ordered even in art and music and random staff, so achieving such objective life which brings order in Isaac life almost in everything, there is no reason to say he is not the perfect human based on the new scientific definition of what is a perfect human.
Read the papers, a perfect human definition source is justified by physics that shows the anti-entropical nature and that's the physics of life, physics of life is universal like gravity and is not something that you can deny or debate about doubts, the father of anti-entropical nature is erwin schrödinger with his book about "what is life" that even helped to discover things about DNA!.
nobelprize.org SAYS : Erwin Schrödinger's idea that physics could help solve biological riddles was the spark that led many researchers to try to unlock the secrets behind our book of life, the structure of DNA. Sources like nature journals say : "The landmark lectures of physicist Erwin Schrödinger helped to change attitudes in biology." Nature is known to be the best valid and superior journal source of scientific papers that are published publicly.