Science logic confirms that the terminology of we're animals and linguistics itself are corrupted

WARNING : YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE BANNED PDF FILES, WE MADE FOR USERS IN PATREON OR HERE TO BE ABLE TO DOWNLOAD THIS ARTICLE AND ANY PDF. ACTUAL DATE OF PUBLISHMENT IS : 2025/febr02/05

[Download this science article as pdf file from down below in the last page!.]

Title is a mechanism of seperating living organism in our mental recallings. Why title categorisation should be applied only based on functionality to be immune to confirmation bias that make humans sound inferior with false info? : 

The current classification system for living beings is deeply flawed because it relies on outdated, biased, and superficial criteria rather than functionality. Modern taxonomy still categorizes species based on ancestral DNA similarities, bone structure, body shape, or even specific traits like bipedal movement—all of which fail to accurately describe an organism's true nature.

Why is this a problem?  :

Titles based on DNA percentages 

Some atheists they call humans apes or animals due to the discovery that humans share a DNA connection in extremely high percentage levels that is over 98% with chimpanzees. This title base logic has a absurd contradiction.

For example : Chimps are not the only animals that share DNA with humans near 98-99% but there are more and one of them guess what, Humans share 98-99% DNA with pigs and 90% with cats, yet humans are only classified as "apes" with the DNA logic and possibly even due to our evolutionary history. If DNA similarity were a valid classification metric, humans should also be called pigs or cats. This clearly exposes the failure of DNA-based titles. You think evolutionary history is immune to such corruption of logic and truth?, we just started the debunking of inferiority of humans in titles at least.

Titles based on evolutionary history ignore functional evolution.  

Birds evolved from dinosaurs, yet we do not call them dinosaurs. strange as it may sound) birds are technically considered reptiles.

If humans are "apes" based on evolutionary history, then it makes no sense because based on evolutionary history, evolution of species are about species that evolved over time by adapting and shaping into different versions of itself, basically our most distant evolutionary version of humans are fishes and yet, nobody calls humans fish. 

In fact, we don't call any animal a fish even when they are directly connected in their source of existence there too, if we use evolutionary history logic then it would be even more accurate to call human and animals together as living organisms since life begin from mere living organisms that they were basically mere micro-organisms than animals! and yet.. no scientist or expert does uses evolutionary history logic based title accurately due to for confirmation bias reasons, confirmation bias it means basically choosing or manipulating knowledge in away that has nothing to do with real life to fullfil their imagination for the real world. (very simplified explanation of confirmation bias.) It would be more accurate biologically to say humans are intelligent organisms instead of animals or apes.This proves evolutionary history should not dictate category titles. Thats why later in the description we explain why is more accurate to say were traced fishes and traced apes instead of mere apes or animals.

Titles based on physical structure (shape, bipedalism) are misleading :

Bipedalism is not unique to humans—kangaroos, ostriches, and even some lizards walk on two legs. Bats can also fly like birds do, but no one calls them birds so far!, is that fair?.. penguins are called birds and yet, they are impossible to fly.. as we see cagetory and titles are corrupted because get made them more complicated, it would be easier if we had a narrow title selection and category based on logic of functionality rather than made up 100 titles and categories. Gorillas in functionality seem to behave very alike almost like the other apes, from everything they seem very similar beyond just brain intelligent. In other hand, humans visually look like aliens in animal kingdom and even in biology in some sense.. if you read the whole article you will know more why.

Titles based on finger-prints :

But apes and humans are the only living beings able to have finger-prints so close that you could confuse it for human right?, WRONG!.. animals beyond apes have the ability to have finger prints that could fool a human, one of the animals that has finger-prints too and basically fingers, is the animal "koala" and they say about it "The fingerprints were so similar to humans' that he worried they could easily be mixed up by detectives." Or "Koalas have fingerprints almost identical to ours" and yet.. no one dares to call a koala.. the body shape seems quite similar to human, I mean it has 2 legs and 2 hands and the head shape is simiar too, it reminds me a humanoid that walks while is cute. The source IS HERE : https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/koala-fingerprints/ Using similarities as we see are logical fallacies to use them as excuse to give humans the category of apes in body shapes or maybe "unique" traits like finger-prints when even koalas have them. In theory, there could be easily countless virtual simulations that show animals that are extremely similar with humans in everyway without calling them "Primates apes" and they would dare instead to call them "aliens" for confirmation bias reasons. If bone shape and superficial physical traits define classification, we would be forced to put unrelated species together.

Titles based on brain similarities and brain size : 

Dolphins and chimps have similar brains to humans, a research shows that a evidence of minor self-recognition in the dolphin, an ability previously thought to be exclusive to humans humans and apes. Everyone that only great apes have a big brain and based on that, we should declare humans to get the title of "apes" when in reality even whales and elephants have bigger brain than humans, heck we also see dolphins have very similar brains to humans beyond apes.

Our cognitive cousins. The eminent dolphin researcher Louis Herman coined the term 'cognitive cousins' to refer to the fact that bottlenose dolphin cognition appears to be at a level also typical of great apes and humans. This similarity may be surprising, as primates and dolphins are only very distantly related. But the two groups share other characteristics indicative of complex intelligence and cognitive ability, especially high encephalization levels, long juvenile periods and complicated social lives. Modern humans have the highest EQ: about 7, so our brains are about 7 times the size one would expect for an animal of our body size. But many dolphins possess EQs in the 4–5 range, tantalizingly close to the modern human level, and significantly higher than all other animals. Like humans, dolphins are, without a doubt, brainiacs of the animal kingdom!. 

The bottlenose dolphin is one of a very limited group of nonhuman species – great apes and parrots are the others – that have demonstrated compelling capacities to understand a rule-based symbolic artificial 'language'. Louis Herman and his colleagues have shown that dolphins are capable of semantics (comprehending visual and auditory symbols as 'words') and syntax (understanding that changes in word order change the meaning of a sentence). Dolphins even understand symbolic references to objects that are absent. Out of sight – not out of mind!. As we see no one calls dolphins "APES" or humans dolphins. As you see titles are used in wrong way entirely.

What is the solution? Functional Categorization. 

Titles should be as narrow as possible, for examples the old version of calling animals was supposed to be beyond biology and even it was about souls, we should use that for non intelligent living beings, that's the only way to eliminate subconscious cognitive corruption in mental images separation system, because in reality titles often could mean nothing like our names are, we just use seperative methods to understand what every animal does and remember them, we should not call them all apes or something stupid for a reminder. Of course now, most apes function merely like apes.. I mean gorillas are extremely the same in functionality with chimps. In case if you dare to say that applies to humans too, ok at least do not assume for pure humans that they function that way, Isaac mosinyan is free from evolutionary noises as a separate article of Isaac explains what is a pure human and why it has nothing to do with animalistic behavior, so while some humans behave like apes due to high sexual desire or primitive behaviors, in theory a human could achieve pure human nature state immune to evolutionary history.

Explaining the professional linguistic use of terminologies :  

So to give more details of what is a insulting version of "animal" use since is no useful for professional academic lingusitic use. We acknowledge that there are many subjective linguistic uses in our world, like "atoms" and such, but harmful mental negative connections must removed, sometimes our "agents of order" followers we call them "mental viruses" but this should not be used as excuse to violate the only life purpose and that is "absolute order" that is concluded in our previous papers about the anti-entropical nature, a work discovered by erwin schrodinger about the book "what is life" where while he explained the details about self organising matter, they never bothered to show the conclusion when life reaches on the extremes as "final endgame" for anti-entropical nature, but we did and is absolute order, because life only care for order and more order means harder to die. The insulting version of animal is even when explained previously, a more detailed is here : An "animal" in its derogatory or insulting sense refers to a being perceived as driven solely by primal instincts, lacking sophistication, moral reasoning, or higher intelligence. This usage strips away individuality, autonomy, and dignity, reducing the individual to base, inferior existence. It often conveys the following characteristics: Lack of Self-Control, An insult implying the individual behaves recklessly or impulsively, driven by raw emotion or instinct. Examples: Someone who lashes out in anger might be mocked as "an angry animal." Inferiority in Intelligence, Suggests a being incapable of complex thought, reasoning, or higher learning, equating them with creatures that act on survival instincts rather than rationality. Examples: "You re acting like a dumb animal." Uncivilized Behavior, Portrays someone as barbaric, unrefined, or crude, often invoking imagery of wild creatures unfit for societal norms. Examples: Insults like "wild animal" used to describe someone perceived as chaotic or disruptive. Lack of Worth or Humanity, Dehumanizing language implying the person lacks intrinsic value or human decency, turning their existence into something "less than human." Examples: "You re nothing but an animal," implying someone is undeserving of respect or consideration. This is the extreme spectrum of demi-humans, by default demi-humans are not like that, in reality even tho they are demi-humans many, they have empathy and many more, even albert einstein was demi-human, but he was far from extreme ranges, actually he was a average demi-human almost too, no one officially achieved a status of pure human and perfect human as isaac mosinyan paper shows of. Isaac mosinyan claims he is only the person that he achieved the status "pure human" and possibly even the title "perfect human" because he is a extremist supporter of "what is life" book from erwin and extremist follower of anti-entropical nature, he is extremist objectivist, he hates subjectivity. What caused him such behavior changes?, the reason is life itself is trauma, a word without god and afterlife and random patterns of reality would drive any pure or nearly pure logical creature with balanced hormones that allow the person to not trap itself in a emotional loops, like the isaac mosinyan achieved this escape velocity of ape reprogramming animalistic system, he overrided billions years of reprogramming, something similar maybe isaac newton did possibly, there were mentions of him trying to channel his bio-impulses of energy like lust into reading books or something to remain "pure" in his own way. In a way, isaac newton was right in the idea of purity if that was the case, but he did not discover the full spectrum of how to be correctly pure human like isaac mosinyan did. Anyway, back to the insulting use of animals : Anthropomorphic Misinterpretation of "Animal" and Examples are : "You re nothing but an animal," implying someone is undeserving of respect or consideration, from cultural and historical uses of that term. Even calling humans apes is largely wrong, even the previous ideas of calling us "animals" is again wrong in many ways, even our bodies are practically aliens in the animal kingdom. Humans are hardly animals, is because lack of any hair almost and we get cold, our very weak skin and body and bones, current humans know only how to survive in supermarket, so someone like that either skinny person or strong person goes to nature he/she will die in 1 month at most optimistic case, in worst case 7 days. Were practically aliens in animal kingdom, so just because we might share some patterns with them, that physiological patterns does not reduce us into apes or animals. The professional linguistic use of calling us "family tree of apes" is also largely subjective and wrong, there is a more accurate scientific terminology to refer someone to recall his evolutionary tree, there is a huge range of our evolutionary direct family, refering me "as ape" is a corrupted and has the same problem of "cognitive behavioral" bias information share problem, wrong title targetting that leads to wrong mental images, there is no way i will accept such large subjective linguistic use that accuses me as mere "ape" and equal to them even when i know the person tried to use the term in scientific sense rather than insulting purposes. Do you remember when we said the purpose of life is absolute order and absolute mental order is our duty or else inevitable our survival rates would decrease statistically since any rejection of anti-entropical nature that is a law of life from physics when physics are inevitable forces of future and present in actions, we know we must adapt fast, were not omniscient to know if small chaotic patterns will not do harm, for another example our future is automation and eventually super AI must align with our mental order of language to share information, one wrong movement and subjective error in the linguistic use, it could make wrong operations and eventually as unpredictable domino effect, destroy many things or damage, so a linguistic objective system is vital, the era of super ai that a planet is turned into "a earth size computer" is inevitable, because such system makes information more deterministic and it can take more energy and make more operations easier, i mean we know a anti-entropical is basically a giant universe size brain, so it makes sense why a earth size computer will happen. So how we can recall our evolutionary tree spectrums?, it starts from first living organisms, to fish and the most recent version of our bioconsumer systems, are called apes and present day version of bio-consumer versions are called "homo sapien." Conclusion : A professional scientific terminology of recalling our evolutionary direct families are : Traced fishes and traced apes, the choice of words specifically as way of use is happening because they are both at extreme ranges in positive and negative ways, one very old version and the second the most recent version update of our biology that are the apes. If someone say "so were apes after all?, our true family are apes" you can then reply them "No, there is no true families, they are just family as living beings and it happens to be indirect tree roots of our biological bodies that are evolved from them, our families generally are every living creature, they can be traced back to the same allfather and thats the first living thing." So we confirm here that no matter what animal name you can refer me due to familiar roots either direct or indirect, you can t justify behavioral patterns based on them, a pure human and human nature is pure intelligent. The way that we use titles of species is based on unique functionalities to reduce the biases and separate each animal differently, thats why there are many apes out there but have also many names, even tho it would be more accurate to call them differently, because calling humans as apes is still unprofessional in terms of scientific linguistic sense. One way to insult someone is "humanoid ape" and thats basically a "demi-human" at worst qualities, but they are not yet in other extreme ranges, the extreme range of "demi-human" is merely "ape" as reference to a human. "Demi-human" in our previous papers about "pure humans" are confirmed as direct literall use of linguistic words rather than metaphorical, because we defined the origin "demi" and what is half human. Why a professional linguistic use is only true in case of "traced apes" and "traced fishes" when it comes to recall our evolutionary tree?, is because is again entirely immune to subjective linguistic uses that could used either as weapon like insult or anything as close to error in our mental order, because "traced" is literal description of a source from a tree basically, is not something metaphysical and is actual word that is not used even when is famous enough.

We solved the outdated terminology uses such as "animal" when we know souls do not exist and mental viruses that enforce ape reprogramming animalistic systems to recall stupid behavior as normal, animal word was one of them and thats why many with sense of their existence would feel insulted, mental order is our duty based on anti-entropical nature. We can even justify a such rigor linguistic use of words somewhat without anti-entropical nature as excuse in a way, one example is our subconscious system are mechanical survival mechanism and they are not changed at all almost, they are largely still the same as evolutionary animals are and even in sexual behaviors, sadly that subconscious system become a hydrid part of our intelligent brain parts, while is not completely the same because our brain due to evolution made large changes to align with our intelligent brain mechanism, we know conscious effort power in our brain based on Kahneman a nobel prize winner a expert confirmed that our conscious actions are only 2% while the rest 98% are unconscious decisions subconsciously, basically 98 percent impulsive decisions and emotional behaviors are due to corrupted human nature, thats why nobody was officialy a pure human, it requires possibly specific settings of hormonal levels to allow a balanced emotional fluctuations on the user, but even that itself is not enough, it also requires to accept reality and the reality is pure nihilism and everything is artificial man made ideas, thats the part of training and the result will be a half-nihilist, where the person accepts life has meaning, but anything artificial is meaningless and hedonism and random emotions are meaningless and that makes their life meaningless if they dont follow the anti-entropical nature and that means absolute order as meaning of life. So our animal brain part can make alot of mistakes from subjective use of words, yes words like "Atoms" can have subjective use, but they do not re-enforce mental chaos that promote also "ape reprogramming animalistic system" due to how weak our conscious part is, in fact our conscious system is million times weaker than subconsciousness, so it makes sense to copy false behaviors overtime as normal and normalize them because were so used to weird namings after the fall of religion due to "Darwinian era" and after the "sexual revolution" from feminists where it lead to accept hedonistic behaviors like sex as "human nature" and normal rather than corruptions, so most emotional atheists are now very used to the idea of social Darwinism or Darwinian idea of "were" animals in the misunderstanding way rather than scientific use of it, thats why we hear from our co-workers were animals and its ok to feel good, they say we must get as high body count as possible "to be more man" but in reality, you are just becoming "more inferior male ape or humanoid ape." In the future, were going to show why even terminologies like "male" and "females" would also change, because they are connected with our created papers and together are such a large web of revolutionary chains of thoughts, every paper are almost direct connected so far, even when the communication skills are quite messy, it is at least obvious what we want to confirm here scientifically. Woman and man would be most accurate way by default to refer someone, but calling me a male would be direct insult and the reasons would be obvious when we know the science of animals and the idea of apes as mental viruses that promote "ape reprogramming animalistic system" subconsciously animalistic behaviors. You can pretty much already predict that we would do that so far or even know what were going to say in the next paper, yes there would be also paper that nudity is not good in a rigor manner and we will confirm provocation is real phenomenal and is not about "learn self control" because reality is much more complex than that, as we said blind follow of anti-entropical nature should happen without question because were not omniscient, it doesn t matter if you find it "very small chao level" besides is the only purpose of life we have so far, denying that, you deny that you are a human and you are just a parasite because you are made to increase order as human, you are not really animal no matter how badly you want it. Also, in future papers in case nudity, vision has very direct evolutionary reprogrammings sadly directly to our subconscious system, nudity itself is a mechanism of self-preservation and thats good if were animals, but thankfully were not animals, were just traced apes and traced fishes, human function differently and every creature is unique in their own way in the hierarchy of the anti-entropical range in specific roles. Those are the hints we gived so far and subconscious systems are directly sadly animalistic and there is nothing human to it, they have a large power to overwrite conscious effort very often, that makes it harder to make general public to everyone become geniues. Another hint for future science articles, one of them is everyone can become geniuess almost, the amount of brain neurons are almost the same and nothing prevents us, except from our sexual hormonal settings and hormones of emotions like dopamine and serotonin, so hormonal engineering in the future is vital to become the norm, especially when it comes to gun control and thats another future research that we gived as hint for the viewers." Don t give any revised version of them, just tell me how it sounds so far?, how formal it sounds so far?, give as detailed answer as possible, how logically valid it sounds and how impossible is deny this scientific logic?, is it a objective conclusion so far?.

[Download this science article as pdf file from down below in the last page!.]